The Wall Street Journal
The wall street journal sucks. It's like some exclusive cult that costs 50 bucks to join and it is full of shit that no one really cares about, at least if they are cool. I hate this newspaper. When it comes in my mailbox( I had to subscribe for a class) I just want to burn it. That's all its really good for. Making fire. Along with making little business guys and girls think they are cool and informed.
Rating:0.00
Comments
-
1It's not exclusive if an ass like you can buy it. Big Money makes the world go ' round. Like it or not.
Before you burn it , why don't you wrap it around your head ?
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
2New York Times = $4 on sunday...4 dollars?
kiss my ass !!!!!
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
3too bad you are not one of the people that makes the world go round. You wish you had big money you lazy fatass. You can wrap your mommas underwear on your head after I give it to you. fag.
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
4Somehow I would have expected the rebuttals from the Wall Street Journal supporters to be more... oh, I don't know... eloquent?
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
5Comment 1: a few definitions of exclusive
excluding or tending to exclude, as from use or possession
admitting only members of a socially restricted or very carefully selected group
Listen, dumbass ( first comment ) , people are excluded from possession of the paper if they cannot pay the fee to subscribe. That makes it exclusive to people that can afford it, asshole. Why don't you fucking think before you post some dumb shit like that.
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
6Big money makes your girl go round
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
7anyone who buys newspapers are fucking morons. you can get all your news for free on the Internet.
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
8"you can get all your news for free on the Internet"
Yeah, between blogs, The Onion, and Wikipedia, you can get all the misinformation you need.
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
9Comment #3 is the winner!
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
10No, oops, nevermind, comment #4 is the winner.
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
11You are not a winner, you loser above me
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
12WSJ has some good articles.
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
13"Yeah, between blogs, The Onion, and Wikipedia, you can get all the misinformation you need."
So those are the ONLY news sources on the Internet, right you retarded fuck?
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
14Wikipedia is bad cuz the TV said so!
Posted 11 months ago | Report -
15"So those are the ONLY news sources on the Internet, right you retarded fuck?"
Of course not, but you aren't smart enough to get the point. If there are sites that provide news that isn't true, how can you trust any news site on the Net?
Those sites were example you moron. Obviously I'm not going to list every possible news source on the Net.
Posted 11 months ago | Report