People with speech impediments should be executed.
I don't care what any of you say. There is no excuse for people with speech impediments. Your parents were brother and sister, so you talk with the infliction of a toddler and you're a grown man? Bullets to the face. The word "paper" is NOT pronounced "PAY-POH". There are speech therapy classes available for you inbred fucks, and you know what, if the classes don't help, bullets to the face. We as a species need to assist in the furthering of evolution. Step one, take out the inbreds. Look at that picture of Mike Tyson, another fuck with a speech impediment. Why hasn't someone shot his worthless ass?
Rating:3.00
Comments
-
1
Great idea, further evolution by eliminated genetic variation!
Evolution isn't served by eliminating people, it's served by allowing EVERYONE to survive during times of excess resources, and then when an unexpected change occurs, some people just may have the necessary traits to handle it.
You idiots who want to advance evolution by killing off abnormal people need to carry your thoughts a little bit further than your emotions. A thousand bucks says if you saw the first fish with mutated fins and near-worthless muscles sticking into them, you'd have had it killed to "advance evolution." Go read a book.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
2
Putting all of your baseless and pretty much heartless assumptions aside, there are apparently people that are born in this world that you are unaware of. Those people, whose parents are often kind and loving people, are not, in fact, siblings, cousins, or any other relation. One of my best friends' sister was born with a speech impediment, something that was unable to be fixed with simple speech therapy classes.
She's a wonderful, kind, and amazing person. Much unlike yourself.
P.S. It's ironic that you think getting 'rid of' people with speech problems will help us advance as a species; I believe that it's getting rid of people who are so close-minded and ignorant (like you) that will further us intellectually.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
3
you are getting remarkably close to hitler's euthanasia program
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
4
Same idea as the Darwin Awards.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
5
not even close. the darwin awards celebrate people who died due to their stupidity. This jackass wants to kill people because of physical defects that are not fatal.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
6
You want to kill Elmer Fudd?!
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
7
I hate scwewy wabbits.... wuhuhuhuhuh
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
8
people who complain about people with speech impediments should be executed.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
9
I wesent that.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
10
I wesemble that wemawk.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
11
Sooo...basically, you're a giant asshole? Awesome.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
12
All you have to do is make fun of these people every time they come around until they cry and feel like retards. They will eventually do one of the following:
Do something about it. ( least likely )
Stop coming around. ( most likely )
Bullets to the face. ( hopefully )
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
13
'remarkably close to hitler'
no chance, hitler wanted all blue eyed blond haired
the tit who wrote the inital post is just trying to be contraversial to provoke some sort of flaming
person/people who said that for evolution we need to keep everyone around, don't be silly.
if we went an removed everybody with a genetic disability in their genes from the gene pool (i don't mean kill, just stop them having kids) then withing a generation, the human race would be better.
if there wasn't so much given by government, then there would be less lazy people living in council housing, watching big-ass tv's, and doing not a touch of work, while having many kids for more benefits...
have you ever noticed that smart people have to put alot of time into working to pay for all the stupid people's benefits?
the successful people don't have time to have kids
the failures do
good genes are dying out...
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
14
It is remarkably close to Hitler. If you had more than a third grade education, you would realise that the euthanasia program had nothing whatsoever to do with the Aryan race. It was all about getting rid of people with disabilities so that the state did not have to expend resources for them. (because they were more or less worthless) Pretty shitty philosophy, but completely separate from his views on Ayrans
Posted 10 months ago | Report
-
15
"person/people who said that for evolution we need to keep everyone around, don't be silly.
if we went an removed everybody with a genetic disability in their genes from the gene pool (i don't mean kill, just stop them having kids) then withing a generation, the human race would be better."
Again, I specifically asked you to THINK. I am aware that you think that a smarter stronger person is somehow "Better." You retarded fuckwad. Know why many of our ancestors went extinct? They were too big, their bodies produced too much heat. They died of dehydration and strokes. Think about this, you fuck. THINK about it, don't just say what you feel. If we have a bunch of people with large brains (NOTE: highly energy consuming and highly susceptible to stroke), large strong bodies (NOTE: less capable of radiating body heat, more prone to producing body heat, requiring more water to maintain, highly energy consuming, etc.) what do you think would happen if temperatures went up (global warming) and some other catastrophe struck at the same time-- say, something that messed with our ability to get water from a tap and run an air conditioner. We would all fucking die of dehydration or stroke, or inability to feed our massive, energy-consuming bodies. Smarter people are better able to navigate SOCIETY, not better able to survive a catastrophe. In addition, no one knows how rare mutations may combine to end up producing something useful. We have more resources than we're using, and the most intelligent way to allow future human evolution to proceed is to maximize genetic variation. WHEN THE TIME COMES that our resource pool dwindles, and survival becomes an issue, THAT is when the people who are unsuccessful-- by NATURE'S standards-- will be weeded out.
As I said before (you FUCKING MORON), I'm sure if someone like you had decided to make life on earth as successful as it can be, you would have gone about it like this: fish need to swim fast to catch prey and avoid predation. Therefore, only the strongest and fastest fish should be allowed to reproduce, thus improving the fish species. Luckily for us, you weren't around, because the first fish with leglike mutations were NOT at a competitive advantage to the other fishes, they were inferior. LUCKLY for amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals, there was an excess of resources at the time, and they were able to survive and move to new habitats, where their traits actually did provide them with a slight advantage. (NOTE that periods of adaptive radiation-- IE, EVOLUTION-- do NOT occur during periods of extinction or transition, THEY OCCUR when resources are PLENTIFUL and conditions are STABLE.)
You are too stupid to realize that what makes someone "Better" in their current situation-- where we survive by finding silly things to put on our resume, taking tests, and then following the instructions of our bosses-- does NOT make someone better able to survive unknown future situations, and does NOT predispose them to accumulate mutations at various genes that might provide frameworks for future evolution.
MOST EVOLUTION proceeds initially through a gene duplication, which often have somewhat harmful effects. But that duplication is the substrate for accumulation of changes, which can lead to adaptation.
So pull your head out of your ass and don't call things silly because you don't understand them.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
1
Great idea, further evolution by eliminated genetic variation!Evolution isn't served by eliminating people, it's served by allowing EVERYONE to survive during times of excess resources, and then when an unexpected change occurs, some people just may have the necessary traits to handle it.
You idiots who want to advance evolution by killing off abnormal people need to carry your thoughts a little bit further than your emotions. A thousand bucks says if you saw the first fish with mutated fins and near-worthless muscles sticking into them, you'd have had it killed to "advance evolution." Go read a book.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
2
Putting all of your baseless and pretty much heartless assumptions aside, there are apparently people that are born in this world that you are unaware of. Those people, whose parents are often kind and loving people, are not, in fact, siblings, cousins, or any other relation. One of my best friends' sister was born with a speech impediment, something that was unable to be fixed with simple speech therapy classes.She's a wonderful, kind, and amazing person. Much unlike yourself.
P.S. It's ironic that you think getting 'rid of' people with speech problems will help us advance as a species; I believe that it's getting rid of people who are so close-minded and ignorant (like you) that will further us intellectually.
Posted 10 months ago | Report
3
you are getting remarkably close to hitler's euthanasia programPosted 10 months ago | Report
4
Same idea as the Darwin Awards.Posted 10 months ago | Report
5
not even close. the darwin awards celebrate people who died due to their stupidity. This jackass wants to kill people because of physical defects that are not fatal.Posted 10 months ago | Report
6
You want to kill Elmer Fudd?!Posted 10 months ago | Report
7
I hate scwewy wabbits.... wuhuhuhuhuhPosted 10 months ago | Report
8
people who complain about people with speech impediments should be executed.Posted 10 months ago | Report
9
I wesent that.Posted 10 months ago | Report
10
I wesemble that wemawk.Posted 10 months ago | Report
11
Sooo...basically, you're a giant asshole? Awesome.Posted 10 months ago | Report
12
All you have to do is make fun of these people every time they come around until they cry and feel like retards. They will eventually do one of the following:Do something about it. ( least likely )
Stop coming around. ( most likely )
Bullets to the face. ( hopefully )
Posted 10 months ago | Report
13
'remarkably close to hitler'no chance, hitler wanted all blue eyed blond haired
the tit who wrote the inital post is just trying to be contraversial to provoke some sort of flaming
person/people who said that for evolution we need to keep everyone around, don't be silly.
if we went an removed everybody with a genetic disability in their genes from the gene pool (i don't mean kill, just stop them having kids) then withing a generation, the human race would be better.
if there wasn't so much given by government, then there would be less lazy people living in council housing, watching big-ass tv's, and doing not a touch of work, while having many kids for more benefits...
have you ever noticed that smart people have to put alot of time into working to pay for all the stupid people's benefits?
the successful people don't have time to have kids
the failures do
good genes are dying out...
Posted 10 months ago | Report
14
It is remarkably close to Hitler. If you had more than a third grade education, you would realise that the euthanasia program had nothing whatsoever to do with the Aryan race. It was all about getting rid of people with disabilities so that the state did not have to expend resources for them. (because they were more or less worthless) Pretty shitty philosophy, but completely separate from his views on AyransPosted 10 months ago | Report
15
"person/people who said that for evolution we need to keep everyone around, don't be silly.if we went an removed everybody with a genetic disability in their genes from the gene pool (i don't mean kill, just stop them having kids) then withing a generation, the human race would be better."
Again, I specifically asked you to THINK. I am aware that you think that a smarter stronger person is somehow "Better." You retarded fuckwad. Know why many of our ancestors went extinct? They were too big, their bodies produced too much heat. They died of dehydration and strokes. Think about this, you fuck. THINK about it, don't just say what you feel. If we have a bunch of people with large brains (NOTE: highly energy consuming and highly susceptible to stroke), large strong bodies (NOTE: less capable of radiating body heat, more prone to producing body heat, requiring more water to maintain, highly energy consuming, etc.) what do you think would happen if temperatures went up (global warming) and some other catastrophe struck at the same time-- say, something that messed with our ability to get water from a tap and run an air conditioner. We would all fucking die of dehydration or stroke, or inability to feed our massive, energy-consuming bodies. Smarter people are better able to navigate SOCIETY, not better able to survive a catastrophe. In addition, no one knows how rare mutations may combine to end up producing something useful. We have more resources than we're using, and the most intelligent way to allow future human evolution to proceed is to maximize genetic variation. WHEN THE TIME COMES that our resource pool dwindles, and survival becomes an issue, THAT is when the people who are unsuccessful-- by NATURE'S standards-- will be weeded out.
As I said before (you FUCKING MORON), I'm sure if someone like you had decided to make life on earth as successful as it can be, you would have gone about it like this: fish need to swim fast to catch prey and avoid predation. Therefore, only the strongest and fastest fish should be allowed to reproduce, thus improving the fish species. Luckily for us, you weren't around, because the first fish with leglike mutations were NOT at a competitive advantage to the other fishes, they were inferior. LUCKLY for amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals, there was an excess of resources at the time, and they were able to survive and move to new habitats, where their traits actually did provide them with a slight advantage. (NOTE that periods of adaptive radiation-- IE, EVOLUTION-- do NOT occur during periods of extinction or transition, THEY OCCUR when resources are PLENTIFUL and conditions are STABLE.)
You are too stupid to realize that what makes someone "Better" in their current situation-- where we survive by finding silly things to put on our resume, taking tests, and then following the instructions of our bosses-- does NOT make someone better able to survive unknown future situations, and does NOT predispose them to accumulate mutations at various genes that might provide frameworks for future evolution.
MOST EVOLUTION proceeds initially through a gene duplication, which often have somewhat harmful effects. But that duplication is the substrate for accumulation of changes, which can lead to adaptation.
So pull your head out of your ass and don't call things silly because you don't understand them.
Posted 10 months ago | Report