Up the ass Again
U and me, the average individual taxpayers are taking one up the ass again! The young go for the bucks kids don't remember the savings and loan scandal that cost us mega billions, so they think a baiol out now is the way to go. I'm so tired of all the hypocracy that I say let it go, let AIG and the rest fail. We've forgotten how to suffer here in america. We don't feel we should ever suffer a loss in life, esp. financially. A good depression would purge some of the slop from our nation, but we'd forget the lesson just like we forgot the lesson of the great depression: when the rich have too much, and always want more (except for regulation of course), we see gluttinous excess . Regulation is not a dirty word. Executives are better chained to them, permanantly. If you don't think so, move to china and get a job. Bring your suits and ties with you you sanctimonious hypocritical rich fucks.Rating:0.00
Comments
-
1
Im with you! I was just bitching about this to a friend of mine. Where the FUCK has RESPONSIBILITY gone. THis is not going to teach those assholes a lesson. Ofcourse, people like you and I are going to suffer the consequences of the tax burden, while these pricks are going to move to the next greedy thing. Here we are the responsible people forceing to choose between an old and outdated republican or a young but full of shit democrat.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
2
It's truly fucking sad... We have become the fooled population. They have been getting over on us for a while now, but what the fuck can we do about it? I'm all out of ideas here.
Signed,
Give me a fucking break
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
3
Let them all burn. Businesses, stockholders and homeowners.
We will all take a hit and maybe learn something?
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
4
^ It'll be interesting if it comes to that because virtually all of our regular army and much of our national guard are all sitting in the big sandbox 10,000 miles away. So if there were serious insurrection here at home, Uncle Sam would have his nuts in a vise. It would come down to how much our hometown police forces felt like taking on their own citizens, my bet would be that they'd lay down the batons and join us.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
5
Maybe "revolution" is not such a dirty word after all. Our founding fatherts certianly didn't think so.
Maybe it's time the blood of the rich paid the price for democracy. Lord knows the blood of the poor has been spent freely enough.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
6
Yeah, go ahead and revolt. Then what? Do you have any idea of what to do afterwards, or do you just prefer anarchy and civil war?
Perhaps you should remove your skull from your backside before making any blind leaps of faith.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
7
#6, why don't we just have another foreign war instead.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
8
Bail out....... FAIL!!
Barney Frank you lisping bitch. 68% of Americans are against this bail out!! Why do you continue to blame congressmen that are following their constituents wishes?
That's why they're called "Representatives"!
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
9
^ They only voted no because Pelosi decided to bloviate to the excess.
I'd like to titty fuck that whore!
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
10
Bunch of jackoffs
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
11
12 of 37 Dems on Barney Franks committee that wrote this bill, voted against it.
More quality public service from our gooberment.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
12
Pelosi has got a huge rack!
Wonder if taxpayers paid for them babies?
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
13
Barney Frank is a hypocrite-
"Starting five years ago, when Frank rejected Bush administration efforts to clamp down on Fannie and Freddie, claiming they were - quote - "not facing a financial crisis," dismissing fears as exaggerations that would "pressure" the lenders to cut back on housing loans to those in need.
Barely 15 months later, with Fannie and Freddie engulfed in scandal over the same "terrible mistakes" Frank so abhors in the private sector, he was conceding they might need to be "better regulated," but "not at the expense of housing" loans.
Fast forward another year, and Frank was still fighting off efforts to curb Fannie and Freddie's borrowing, rejecting a regulator's bid for greater authority, and clearing the way for larger and more lucrative loans, all by way of resisting Republican "extremism," Frank said.
August of 2007, another push by regulators for more oversight is dismissed by Frank, now Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, as "inane.""
This is what the now high and mighty have gotten the us.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
14
#6 Question, If our fore fathers didn't think that when they were alive. We would still under the Queen's rule!
Posted 1 month ago | Report
-
15
Forget Barny frank you fools. The Cheney pipeline has huge amounts moving offshore for the benefit of the few. It's not about dems and repubs anymore, so get off it. It's all about the market and the money, who has it and who does not. As the few suck up the lions share, aided by favorable laws crafted by our elected officials (so we want to impoverish ourselves it seems), who themselves aspire to wealth and plentitude unending, we the "people" are really an irritant to be managed. We are not considered as equals. When you understand this, you might recognise the need for some sort of regulatory muscle. Their absence has produced what we have going on now.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
1
Im with you! I was just bitching about this to a friend of mine. Where the FUCK has RESPONSIBILITY gone. THis is not going to teach those assholes a lesson. Ofcourse, people like you and I are going to suffer the consequences of the tax burden, while these pricks are going to move to the next greedy thing. Here we are the responsible people forceing to choose between an old and outdated republican or a young but full of shit democrat.Posted 1 month ago | Report
2
It's truly fucking sad... We have become the fooled population. They have been getting over on us for a while now, but what the fuck can we do about it? I'm all out of ideas here. Signed,
Give me a fucking break
Posted 1 month ago | Report
3
Let them all burn. Businesses, stockholders and homeowners.We will all take a hit and maybe learn something?
Posted 1 month ago | Report
4
^ It'll be interesting if it comes to that because virtually all of our regular army and much of our national guard are all sitting in the big sandbox 10,000 miles away. So if there were serious insurrection here at home, Uncle Sam would have his nuts in a vise. It would come down to how much our hometown police forces felt like taking on their own citizens, my bet would be that they'd lay down the batons and join us.Posted 1 month ago | Report
5
Maybe "revolution" is not such a dirty word after all. Our founding fatherts certianly didn't think so.Maybe it's time the blood of the rich paid the price for democracy. Lord knows the blood of the poor has been spent freely enough.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
6
Yeah, go ahead and revolt. Then what? Do you have any idea of what to do afterwards, or do you just prefer anarchy and civil war?Perhaps you should remove your skull from your backside before making any blind leaps of faith.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
7
#6, why don't we just have another foreign war instead.Posted 1 month ago | Report
8
Bail out....... FAIL!!Barney Frank you lisping bitch. 68% of Americans are against this bail out!! Why do you continue to blame congressmen that are following their constituents wishes?
That's why they're called "Representatives"!
Posted 1 month ago | Report
9
^ They only voted no because Pelosi decided to bloviate to the excess.I'd like to titty fuck that whore!
Posted 1 month ago | Report
10
Bunch of jackoffsPosted 1 month ago | Report
11
12 of 37 Dems on Barney Franks committee that wrote this bill, voted against it.More quality public service from our gooberment.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
12
Pelosi has got a huge rack!Wonder if taxpayers paid for them babies?
Posted 1 month ago | Report
13
Barney Frank is a hypocrite-"Starting five years ago, when Frank rejected Bush administration efforts to clamp down on Fannie and Freddie, claiming they were - quote - "not facing a financial crisis," dismissing fears as exaggerations that would "pressure" the lenders to cut back on housing loans to those in need.
Barely 15 months later, with Fannie and Freddie engulfed in scandal over the same "terrible mistakes" Frank so abhors in the private sector, he was conceding they might need to be "better regulated," but "not at the expense of housing" loans.
Fast forward another year, and Frank was still fighting off efforts to curb Fannie and Freddie's borrowing, rejecting a regulator's bid for greater authority, and clearing the way for larger and more lucrative loans, all by way of resisting Republican "extremism," Frank said.
August of 2007, another push by regulators for more oversight is dismissed by Frank, now Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, as "inane.""
This is what the now high and mighty have gotten the us.
Posted 1 month ago | Report
14
#6 Question, If our fore fathers didn't think that when they were alive. We would still under the Queen's rule!Posted 1 month ago | Report
15
Forget Barny frank you fools. The Cheney pipeline has huge amounts moving offshore for the benefit of the few. It's not about dems and repubs anymore, so get off it. It's all about the market and the money, who has it and who does not. As the few suck up the lions share, aided by favorable laws crafted by our elected officials (so we want to impoverish ourselves it seems), who themselves aspire to wealth and plentitude unending, we the "people" are really an irritant to be managed. We are not considered as equals. When you understand this, you might recognise the need for some sort of regulatory muscle. Their absence has produced what we have going on now.Posted 1 month ago | Report
