What the GOP offers
Rating:3.00
Comments
-
1
You have a twisted outlook. I'm a Republican, and so are most of my family as well as most of my friends and none of us fit your description.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
2
I'm guessing you're a Democrat and yet here you are name calling. Good job of not making your point, asshole.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
3
That will do for starters
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
4
I don't have much love for the GOP, but just because George Bush is an idiot doesn't mean they all are.
It's this kind of name calling that will only continue to divide us. Way to go fueling that fire jackass.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
5
Well, OP has a valid point, though.
Usually, parties offer their best to run for president.
If Bush is the best GOP has... That much alone can bring sufficient distrust towards whole ideology of this party.
Perhaps, if Republicans in general and GOP in particular renounced Bush and his inane ways that drive USA into the ground, they`d garner more understanding from opposition.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
6
Just go to youtube and look for "The line to nowhere". You'll see the Republican party in all it's splendor. Brilliant people with incisive opinions. LOL.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
7
I consider myself an independent and have voted (good and bad) for my share of Reps and Dems. The only things that bother me are the extremists in either party and how these podunk, head-up-their ass voters in the "swing states" seem to always end up making the final decisions for the rest of us. Couldn't we have out votes weighted by IQ points or something?
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
8
Sounds like most of the Obama supporters too.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
9
Ummm... #5, the last candidate the Dems considered their "best" was Clinton. Should we judge all Dems based on that buffoon?
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
10
^ Why not? He was a lying, cheating scoundrel. His wife is worse.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
11
The dems vice president is more qualified to be president than their presidential candidate. nice.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
12
I'm confused.
You believe you offer something different but state... "the gop offers Anger, hate, name-calling, ass-clenching, fist punching, KKK, assholes".
Isn't this anger, hate and name calling?
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
13
^More hypocrisy from the righteous left.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
14
Well, let`s see here.
When Clinton was in white house, USA budget wasn`t quite turning deficit, now was it?
I`m oversimplifying here, of course, fut frankly, between pervert with a knack for management and religious foolhardy zealot, I`d rather vote for first.
Betweent those two, some kind of president`s pet project has to be funded, that much is unavoidable to keep president happy and productive. However, correct me, if I`m wrong, but funding private brothel is still cheaper then funding private jihad, not to mention more healthy mental-wise.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
-
15
Bunch of a hole loosers.(gop)
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report
It's this kind of name calling that will only continue to divide us. Way to go fueling that fire jackass.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Usually, parties offer their best to run for president.
If Bush is the best GOP has... That much alone can bring sufficient distrust towards whole ideology of this party.
Perhaps, if Republicans in general and GOP in particular renounced Bush and his inane ways that drive USA into the ground, they`d garner more understanding from opposition.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report
You believe you offer something different but state... "the gop offers Anger, hate, name-calling, ass-clenching, fist punching, KKK, assholes".
Isn't this anger, hate and name calling?
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report
When Clinton was in white house, USA budget wasn`t quite turning deficit, now was it?
I`m oversimplifying here, of course, fut frankly, between pervert with a knack for management and religious foolhardy zealot, I`d rather vote for first.
Betweent those two, some kind of president`s pet project has to be funded, that much is unavoidable to keep president happy and productive. However, correct me, if I`m wrong, but funding private brothel is still cheaper then funding private jihad, not to mention more healthy mental-wise.
Posted 2 months ago | Report
Posted 2 months ago | Report





