Creationist Museum
Honestly, WHAT THE FUCK?How can you blanket the history of the universe in a mere 6,000 years? How can you explain the extinction of dinosaurs through overhunting? How can you have such fervent conviction? The earth's own geological record blows all of your "theories" straight to hell, and you know it.
Its okay, we're all scared of the unknown, the universe is a big place, but to say that you are so wise and close to God that you know the truth?
That is blasphemy.
Rating:4.00
Comments
-
16
"I have yet to hear 1 scientist theorize as to how that ball of matter got there."
At least scientists admit when they can't explain something. The Goddists have the explanation for EVERYTHING. No evidence whatsoever, but still an explanation. They should definitely be taken seriously....
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
17
"I think its funny that religious people don't make posts about how much they hate non religious people."
That might require free thought.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
18
No, it might require respect for other people's beliefs, something you have never heard of.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
19
At least scientists admit when they can't explain something. The Goddists have the explanation for EVERYTHING. No evidence whatsoever, but still an explanation. They should definitely be taken seriously....
You watch to much tv. Perhaps Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson know everything, but they dont represent anywhere near the majority of religious people, the just get to go in front of the camera because they are virtually certain to say something stupid.
Most Christians will readily admit that there is a lot they cannot explain. I dont know a single Christian that beleives God is fully within his or her comprehension.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
20
"Most Christians will readily admit that there is a lot they cannot explain. I dont know a single Christian that beleives God is fully within his or her comprehension."
And yet most Christians believe it's their duty to convert the world to their religion, even though the only answer to most probing questions will always be, "you just need to have faith". Faith in what? The fact that you don't have a clue what you're talking about but expect me to believe it?
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
21
Christians will put their faith in a God they cannot see, but who's actions they see the manifestations of. When you think about it, it is not that dissimilar from putting your faith in the big bang, which you never saw, and yet you beleive you see the manifestations of.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
22
And yet I don't got around telling people that if they don't accept the big bang as their lord and savior they won't get into the kingdom of heaven but will spend eternity in hell.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
23
neither do I
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
24
I should respect other people's beliefs all the time. The Flat Earth Society believes the world is flat and that the UN knows this and is hiding it, I should respect that. The KKK believes that Aryan Protestants are superior to everyone else, I should respect that. Kiss my religion-hating ass. God's slutty from what I hear. He's a slut. Lot's of sex is happening around that guy. Byaaagh!
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
25
The KKK hates catholics, so you do have some beliefs in common
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
26
hear hear!! creationists are mentally challenged. i think there's a direct inverse correlation between intelligence and faith.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
27
I have heard of a direct correlation and an inverse correlation. What the hell is a direct inverse correlation??? You speak to your own intelligence
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
28
"What the hell is a direct inverse correlation?"
It's obviously the opposite of an indirect inverse correlation. Apparently you're a creationist and thus mentally challenged.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
29
You are obviously an ignorant fuckwad. Let me explain it to you. Things can be directly correlated, which means that If A goes up, B goes up, and vice versa. Things can also be inversely correlated, which means that if A goes up, B goes down, and vice versa. To claim that something is of direct inverse correlation is to combine to terms which mean the opposite thing, thus creating a term which makes NO FUCKING SENSE.
Sorry I had to drop a second grade education of you douchebag, but there is no such thing as a direct inverse correlation.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
-
30
"No, it might require respect for other people's beliefs, something you have never heard of."
Maybe they should keep their traps shut, stop having their beliefs written into our law books, and stop trying to invade our schools with their bullshit. Maybe then they will earn a small iota of respect.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
16
"I have yet to hear 1 scientist theorize as to how that ball of matter got there."At least scientists admit when they can't explain something. The Goddists have the explanation for EVERYTHING. No evidence whatsoever, but still an explanation. They should definitely be taken seriously....
Posted 1 year ago | Report
17
"I think its funny that religious people don't make posts about how much they hate non religious people."That might require free thought.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
18
No, it might require respect for other people's beliefs, something you have never heard of.Posted 1 year ago | Report
19
At least scientists admit when they can't explain something. The Goddists have the explanation for EVERYTHING. No evidence whatsoever, but still an explanation. They should definitely be taken seriously....You watch to much tv. Perhaps Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson know everything, but they dont represent anywhere near the majority of religious people, the just get to go in front of the camera because they are virtually certain to say something stupid.
Most Christians will readily admit that there is a lot they cannot explain. I dont know a single Christian that beleives God is fully within his or her comprehension.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
20
"Most Christians will readily admit that there is a lot they cannot explain. I dont know a single Christian that beleives God is fully within his or her comprehension."And yet most Christians believe it's their duty to convert the world to their religion, even though the only answer to most probing questions will always be, "you just need to have faith". Faith in what? The fact that you don't have a clue what you're talking about but expect me to believe it?
Posted 1 year ago | Report
21
Christians will put their faith in a God they cannot see, but who's actions they see the manifestations of. When you think about it, it is not that dissimilar from putting your faith in the big bang, which you never saw, and yet you beleive you see the manifestations of.Posted 1 year ago | Report
22
And yet I don't got around telling people that if they don't accept the big bang as their lord and savior they won't get into the kingdom of heaven but will spend eternity in hell.Posted 1 year ago | Report
23
neither do IPosted 1 year ago | Report
24
I should respect other people's beliefs all the time. The Flat Earth Society believes the world is flat and that the UN knows this and is hiding it, I should respect that. The KKK believes that Aryan Protestants are superior to everyone else, I should respect that. Kiss my religion-hating ass. God's slutty from what I hear. He's a slut. Lot's of sex is happening around that guy. Byaaagh!Posted 1 year ago | Report
25
The KKK hates catholics, so you do have some beliefs in commonPosted 1 year ago | Report
26
hear hear!! creationists are mentally challenged. i think there's a direct inverse correlation between intelligence and faith.Posted 1 year ago | Report
27
I have heard of a direct correlation and an inverse correlation. What the hell is a direct inverse correlation??? You speak to your own intelligencePosted 1 year ago | Report
28
"What the hell is a direct inverse correlation?"It's obviously the opposite of an indirect inverse correlation. Apparently you're a creationist and thus mentally challenged.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
29
You are obviously an ignorant fuckwad. Let me explain it to you. Things can be directly correlated, which means that If A goes up, B goes up, and vice versa. Things can also be inversely correlated, which means that if A goes up, B goes down, and vice versa. To claim that something is of direct inverse correlation is to combine to terms which mean the opposite thing, thus creating a term which makes NO FUCKING SENSE. Sorry I had to drop a second grade education of you douchebag, but there is no such thing as a direct inverse correlation.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
30
"No, it might require respect for other people's beliefs, something you have never heard of."Maybe they should keep their traps shut, stop having their beliefs written into our law books, and stop trying to invade our schools with their bullshit. Maybe then they will earn a small iota of respect.
Posted 1 year ago | Report
